"
Do we understand" was on my mind as I was grading intermediate
algebra quizzes over lunch today. In particular, I wondered: do my
students really understand what it means to solve an equation or
inequality? It was clear enough that they knew
how to do it, but do they know what they are accomplishing in the process?
One of the learning targets I have identified for my students reads:
I
can explain what it means to solve equations, inequalities, and
systems, and I can use this knowledge to check my answers for
reasonableness and correctness.
I'll be honest: I
really love that learning target. It was inspired based on one of the
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, specifically, one of the
Grade 6 Expressions and Equations standards:
CCSS-6.EE.5 [Students will] understand solving an equation or inequality as a process of answering
a question: which values from a specified set, if any, make the equation
or inequality true? ... (emphasis added)
That concept is fundamental to the work we do in algebra. Consider the
wide array of situations where the sole directive is "solve". Come to think of it, one of my old doctoral advisors once described "solve" as one of the four universal directives of algebra homework sets. (Can you come up with the other three? Answers appear at the end of the post.)
In the case of "solve", the meaning is universal and boils down to "find the set of [thing(s)] that make this [thing] true". Consider:
- "Solve 3x+4=7" means "Find the values of x that make the equation true."
- "Solve {3x + y = 4, x - 2y = -1}" means "find the ordered pairs that simultaneously make both equations true."
- "Solve y'(x) - y(x) = 0" means "find the family of functions that make the differential equation true."
- "Solve Ax = λx" means "find the real numbers λ and corresponding vectors x, called the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A, that make the matrix equation true."
- "Solve Ax = 0" means "describe the set of vectors x, called the null space of A, that make the matrix equation true."